tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5430866.post4757607713439596614..comments2024-01-02T08:54:14.406-05:00Comments on Peter Bromberg's UnBlog: Yahoo, Google and Microsoft Team Up on Sitemapspeterbromberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18173639411723574123noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5430866.post-7786815910622306112006-12-07T14:28:00.000-05:002006-12-07T14:28:00.000-05:00My email is hongxiaowan(at)gmail.com
I am glad to ...My email is hongxiaowan(at)gmail.com<br />I am glad to discuss some topic with you. Thanks a lot.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5430866.post-9701461506734070712006-11-29T10:25:00.000-05:002006-11-29T10:25:00.000-05:00I like to talk with you for this topic.I like to talk with you for this topic.Hong Xiaowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01260876036302854135noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5430866.post-32270160115626151902006-11-27T08:58:00.000-05:002006-11-27T08:58:00.000-05:00Hi Peter.
1.For "about", please click http://www.s...Hi Peter.<br />1.For "about", please click http://www.sitebases.org/about-sitebases/; for protocol http://www.sitebases.org/protocol/. It is almost the same with sitemaps.org. The search engines maybe treat http://www.sitebases.org as mirror as http://www.sitemaps.org but their different. Just like checks, the same looking. But one is 100USD, another is 10000USD.<br />2.My target is to save 95% hardware cost not only bandwidth cost. The webmasters submit their sitebases including whole content of their websites. The search engine just need to select some pages to check if same as Sitebase. But no need to download whole site. Please see http://www.sitebases.org/protocol/. That will be help you to understand my ideas.<br />3.Sharing the big sitebases will change all. I just said "should" not "must". It is new idea that can save much more money. No matter how many search engine want to protect their Sitebases as private, the newer will open and comes to the next.<br />4.The advertiser will use more platform like adsense, adwords. These platform can be new field.<br />5.Yes, now the limited API still enough. But sometime back busy not as original search engines.<br /><br />All will change.Hong Xiaowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01260876036302854135noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5430866.post-44321732008840367332006-11-25T18:23:00.000-05:002006-11-25T18:23:00.000-05:00Hong,
I looked at your post and I didn't see any p...Hong,<br />I looked at your post and I didn't see any protocol, or API, only a short description. You don't explain how "SiteBases" can save 95% bandwidth.<br /><br />Moreover, what incentive do big search engines, which all compete with each other for advertiser dollars, have to share their result databases with each other?<br /><br />Finally, most big search engines have already opened their APIs for use by developers. Not "Unlimited" use, but enough to do some good things. <br /><br />Maybe you could follow up with some detailed responses to my 3 points?peterbromberghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18173639411723574123noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5430866.post-11984857127649097082006-11-25T15:31:00.000-05:002006-11-25T15:31:00.000-05:00Sitebases, the next protocol after Sitemaps
It can...Sitebases, the next protocol after Sitemaps<br />It can save the time and press for the search engine, also for the websites.<br />It can bring new search engine that named Search Engine 2.0.<br />Using Sitebases protocol, will save 95% bandwidth above. It is another sample for long tail theory.<br />In this protocol, I suggested that all search engine can share their Big Sitebases each other, so the webmaster just need to submit their Sitebases to one Search Engine.<br />And I suggested that all search engines can open their search API for free and unlimited using. <br /><br />Please visit: http://www.sitebases.orgHong Xiaowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01260876036302854135noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5430866.post-70124922584484381742006-11-21T15:13:00.000-05:002006-11-21T15:13:00.000-05:00I bet sidemaps aren't at all important in any way ...I bet sidemaps aren't at all important in any way for anybody who isn't hopelessly unalive.News is Goodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13001488783703989143noreply@blogger.com