SQL Server 2008 RTM - First Experiences

FACTOID: B-2 bombers are capable of dropping 85 500-pound bombs in a single run.

I installed SQL Server 2008 RTM Developer Edition this evening. First it installed .NET Framework 3.5 SP1, no problems. Then we went with the full install and I chose an Upgrade over SQL Server 2005. Everything went fine until the prerequisites check, and it reported FAIL on Visual Studio 2008 - saying that SP1 was required.

Well, I already went through this stuff with Visual Studio 2008 SP1 Beta and it clobbered Silverlight.

So, when you guys solve this issue and provide a Visual Studio 2008 SP1 that preserves all my existing Silverlight 2 BETA 2 work and doesn't put me out of business - then I'll be happy to install SQL Server 2008. Meanwhile, I'm choosing the safe route, which is to keep my powder dry.

Be advised.

UPDATE (8/8/2008): 

According to Microsoft sources, VS 2008 SP1 will be accompanied by a new Silverlight Tools Beta 2 chainer.  The new chainer will have the patch for VS SP1 RTM, and SP1 beta will no longer be supported at that point.

The final Silverlight 2 release is still a ways off.  This is good news. 

NOTE: An interesting statistic: As of Aug 9th, Since August 1, 2008, NBCOlympics.com has accumulated more than 127 million page views, nearly half the total for the entire Athens Games. I bet that is one heck of a lot of Silverlight installations.

Comments

  1. Kevin1:34 PM

    Thanks Pete for the comment. I was going install 2008 when I returned from vacation...I will now have to double think that...

    ReplyDelete
  2. peterbromberg1:46 PM

    @kevin, Yep. I didn't mean it to sound negative even if it came out that way. It's just that I and many others had issues with Silverlight getting clobbered by the VS2008 SP1 Beta and now that SQL 2008 requires it, I found it particularly frustrating.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kalle4:09 PM

    It requires VS 2008 SP1 *RTM* to be installed, since you cannot have both SP0 and SP1 installed side-by-side (and for instance Management Studio is based on the VS shell). It will be released in a few days. I've read Aug 11 somewhere. And needless to say, you can of course install SS 2008 on a server without VS 2008.

    ReplyDelete
  4. peterbromberg5:28 PM

    If as you say that VS2008 SP1 RTM will be out in a few days, that is excellent news.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous5:34 PM

    VS 2008 SP1 RTM on August 11th! What is the excellent about it ? It should released already since the only way to test your apps with SQL 2008 and VS 2008!

    ReplyDelete
  6. peterbromberg6:07 PM

    Yikes! Let's give them 3 days worth of slack!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Some observations on Script Callbacks, "AJAX", "ATLAS" "AHAB" and where it's all going.

I've taken a more than cursory interest in the whole Remote Scripting (.NET species) vs. AJAX and now ATLAS discussion, mostly because I started using Remote Scripting since Microsoft first released it, and because I continued to refine it after seeing Brent Ashley's excellent work with JSRS, which was one of the first "real" cross-browser solutions back in 2000 (that's the turn of the Century for you history buffs). Now Bertrand Leroy, a Microsoft guy whose work I like , has authored some very interesting ASP.NET 2.0 script callback stuff that he points to on his blog, and he is obviously (at least, to me he is) involved quite heavily in the development of this new ATLAS infrastructure that they'll preview at PDC. Leroy's most recent post brings to the surface what I agree are the major differences between the "AJAX a - la .NET" approach as popularized by Michael Swartz with his AJAX.NET library, and Leroy's RefreshPanel, the ASP.NET 2.0 b
Read more

IE7 - Vista: "Internet Explorer has stopped Working"

Image
This one was a bitch. All of a sudden for no reason at all, out of the blue, I get this dialog "internet Explorer has stopped working". I didn't install any new software, crap- I didn't do anything! So here I am using FIREFART to go on the internet and find out what to do! Damn! Good thing I've got the sucker on the same machine (I'm not "anti-Firefox", i just don't use it that much except to check my page renderings). The Fix The fix (at least for me): 1) Go into Control Panel, and choose "Internet Options". 2) Under the "Advanced" tab, press the "RESET" button at the lower right: Don't ask me why this happens, or why the fix works. That's a BUG, D00D - I don't care how you slice it!
Read more

FIREFOX / IE Word-Wrap, Word-Break, TABLES FIX

One of the most annoying things a developer (who would normally delight in writing code, not futzing with markup) can have is getting rendering issues between different browsers. The two biggest players are of course Internet Exploder and Firefart (as I lovingly like to refer to each). In most cases that's going to take care of 98 percent of your total site traffic. IE has had a proprietary "word-break" style attribute for a long time, and this made it into the CSS 3.0 spec. But that doesn't necessarily help you with Firefox right now. Firefox literally - (and I consider this completely idiotic, since it's been in their bug database for FIVE YEARS) does not have a reliable CSS style element to force table cell content to break in the middle of a word in order to stop the content from expanding your table / div off the page or over other content on the page. Here's a partial fix, which will work for most tables and browsers. The style declaration (I call it m
Read more